RE: Gay Marriage - are you for or against it and why?
February 22, 2011 at 12:30 pm
(This post was last modified: February 22, 2011 at 12:43 pm by Violet.)
KichigNeko Wrote:And when a population gets too high for the local resources to support?? Then what ibby??
Then the unlucky, usually weaker members of the populace, die out.. thus advancing the spiral of death that is evolution!!!! ^_^
Doubtie Wrote:If all is meant by "wrong" objectively biologically speaking is the fact that same sex couple's can't reproduce, so what?
Then theoretically they won't reproduce to carry on those genes... making it really weird that they even exist past the odd one or two here and there.
Zen Badger Wrote:And what does reproduction have to do with marriage?
Quite a bit... considering that it is a way to organize the populace along somewhat easy lines. Why are scandinavians such a pain to trace the genealogy of by their names?
Kichi Wrote:Sure Ibby...I'll mention that to the thousands of couples on the IVF programme
The wert? o.0
Zen Badger Wrote:And oft times they reproduce without marriage, or marry but don't(or can't) reproduce.
One is not a requirement of or for the other.
And women have been put aside or slain for "their" barrenness. It's all over history and the wonderful Bible-of-many-men-with-erectile-dysfunction.
The religions pertain to the view that women are for making babies, regardless of how cutely they try to spin their barbarism. The religions also like to think that marriage is their invention... and so one can see this hand in hand working in their minds to prevent homosexual marriage.
Ascendent Wrote:Considering that many same-sex couples can reproduce too(using something like anonymous donors)...
They are reproducing with an unknown person's semen (or stealing the child of a woman)... the religions would have them cast whores and kidnappers.
Please give me a home where cloud buffalo roam
Where the dear and the strangers can play
Where sometimes is heard a discouraging word
But the skies are not stormy all day