(February 25, 2011 at 6:25 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote: TL: DR? In sum, I am unconcerned with wether what happens is rare or common or even if it is 'normal'... as it is hardly relevant to the discussion over _________. What matters is to decide wether what occurs is a problem, and to treat it effectively should it be.
You've pretty much convinced me of your argument. I've been struggling with relativising everything to other things and break away from absolutes - I now understand how the normality argument is moot and missing the point - harm.
(February 25, 2011 at 6:25 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote:Quote:Liar. Post 115, the one you responded to, is not the OP. I was being sincere stating "good job refuting my retracted comment". I thought it well written and the points clearly communicated.Sincerity is sometimes difficult to note through text.
I was complimenting you. Did you wake up today and have a big plate of mean-eggs and ham? Washed it all down with a tall glass of haterade?
Imagine if people took me seriously all the time: they'd think i was a nut.
Oh wait... i am a nut. Never-mind... my argument is irrelevant
Response to both:
Dotard - Why yes it was Hayterade. Or at least a form of aggression that appeared after the n-th go around with "Existentialisms" and certain people on this particular forum (not you). I'm a bit more level headed over this again.
Sae: Yes.
