RE: A good reason not to believe in God
February 28, 2011 at 4:36 pm
(This post was last modified: February 28, 2011 at 4:42 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
I'm explaining that being "before" or "after" time is still talking time because the terms "before" and "after" are temporal terms.
I'm explaining that a glass of milk being both 100% liquid and 100% milk is a poor analogy when compared to God being 100% mortal and 100% immortal, because mortal and immortal are contradictory and liquid and milk are not.
I'm inquiring if atemporality can even be conceptualized at all, since nothing can exist before or after time, I am inquiring in what sense atemporality is "outside" of time.
I have not made an unsupported positive claim I have merely explained logical contradictions and criticized absences of clarity.
I'm explaining that a glass of milk being both 100% liquid and 100% milk is a poor analogy when compared to God being 100% mortal and 100% immortal, because mortal and immortal are contradictory and liquid and milk are not.
I'm inquiring if atemporality can even be conceptualized at all, since nothing can exist before or after time, I am inquiring in what sense atemporality is "outside" of time.
I have not made an unsupported positive claim I have merely explained logical contradictions and criticized absences of clarity.