Natural Order and Science

[robvalue]

I need to make my video about how arguments are not evidence. And metaphors/analogies aren't even arguments, either. They are ways of trying to explain an argument better. They are not the argument.

So if someone just has logical arguments and conclusions, and doesn't in any way validate those conclusions against reality, they are exploring an imaginary abstract world. It may or may not have any bearing on our world, depending on how well the argument's initial assumptions model it. With no evidence and no predictions to test, there's no way to tell.

I notice the OP doesn't even bother writing "therefor God" at the end, because he knows we know that is the implication. It's Allah, in this case. If anyone was wondering. I've dealt with this guy before.