(March 1, 2016 at 2:37 pm)Old Baby Wrote: What I don't get is why people like Drich are here. They don't bring any new arguments or new evidence to the table. It might be different if they were defending their own turf from the challenge of atheists in an environment where empty faith claims and pseudo science actually has a pacifying effect on the audience. At this point Drich is like the guy who registers with the forum just to say "If we came from monkeys, why are there still monkeys?"
at the moment you are 132 posts into this forum...
Aside from a closed mind, and speaking from stereotypes how in all honestly are you able to make that assertion?
I don't teach faith.
I literally employ far more real science than most of you do (I literally used science to dispell every counter claim made about the 'flood' in the last Ark thread we just had, which literally left you guys with nothing more than ad hom attacks) I've quoted works from major universities, NASA, Various experts in given fields, and their books ect..
And i have successfully integrated all of evolution into the creation account, to the point that neither the church or all of 'science' can legitimately argue that the theory I provide is completely dismissable outside of just wishing this were the case.
What you're guilty of BCB (Big Cry Baby just incase you forgot) is a sweeping dismissal. You want your peers to support a dismissal without addressing the talking point you find yourself out of your depth to answer. So you make an appeal against me that actually does not even come close to what I have consistently brought here in the way of discussion for the last several years... This kind of high school crap may work in the other forums you are use to, but does not work here. the established members here (on both sides of the discussion) hold themselves to a high standard, so if you want to stay and not feel like a 'Dry sand' then you are going to have to start speaking topically.
