(March 5, 2016 at 9:46 am)robvalue Wrote: Truth matters, yes. But you're nowhere near any sort of truth, you're wildly speculating.I realise that we are at an impasse but you're being somewhat harsh here. I have provided a truthful definition of "supernatural." From there, I've posited that there are certain events that would qualify as supernatural because they violate natural law. This would also be truthful on the basis that I'm using standard definitions.
This is not consistent with someone who claims to know how science works.
I think we're done. I'll leave you to your imagination.
No matter. I'll continue to answer any posts here till it peters out and then I'll start a new thread on abiogenesis - a process that is claimed as truth but never witnessed, never tested and no reasonable model for it exists. And yet it's still considered fact.
