RE: Overthrowing oppressive regimes by military force
March 9, 2016 at 3:37 am
(This post was last modified: March 9, 2016 at 3:37 am by Aractus.)
(March 8, 2016 at 10:21 am)abaris Wrote: Question thrown right back at you. What history did you learn? Hitler without the conservative support to get him appointed by Hindenburg would have never been able to form a stable government. Virtually every other party was opposed to him.
You said Hitler wasn't elected, he was - end of story. If your claim is that the NAZIs were not elected that's a different claim, but again I'd point out to you that they were the largest party and had achieved a higher party vote than any other party in all elections up until 1933, therefore they were elected to govern. The people expected them to form governance once elected.
(March 8, 2016 at 12:00 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: You'll need to link to a citation for this ridiculous claim of yours. Hitler never was in any parliament. The only office Hitler ever held was Chancellor -- an executive and not legislative position -- gained by appointment from Hindenburg.
That's a gross simplification. People didn't vote for individual candidates, they voted for parties. Hitler got in by taking one of the seats that the NAZI party won in the 1933 election. He was elected into office. And as far as I know he held a parliamentary seat since 1925 - he was known as the leader of the NAZI party are you saying the leader didn't have a seat in parliament until 1933? Where's your evidence?
So what that he was appointed Chancellor? That's how a parliamentarian in Australia becomes Prime Minister, it's hardly unusual, the fact is he was elected, he held a seat, he led the party, his party formed governance and as part of forming governance he was appointed Chancellor.
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke