(March 10, 2016 at 5:23 am)abaris Wrote: Don't know why I have to do your homework before making false claims, but here goes. Look at 1932. The void you should be looking for is under the letter H. If you're so inclined, you can look at the letter H all the way back to the year 1920.
It's filled after the elections of march '33, since Hitler already was chancellor at that time.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liste_der_...r_Republik
Okay I'll accept that list. Hitler personally was not elected, but how does that change the fact that the NAZIs were elected to govern? And they formed a coalition with a majority from the December 1932 election result?
Germany in 1932 was more of a democracy than the USA is today. They had greater voter representation. The problem was that that the President had too much power. As you know he is the one who elected the Chancellor, and he could give the Chancellor the emergency powers to "rule by decree" which is pretty much what all the Chancellors leading up to Hitler were doing because the parliament was too divided.
What really screwed Germany was the in 1934 the President died and Hitler assumed his responsibilities. That was illegal, but no one stopped him.
So let's backtrack. None of this has anything to do with Hitler personally. Yes he was the leader of the NAZI party, and yes he was the one who wanted the direction the party went in in the later 1920s that ultimately lead to them gaining power, but even without him those events probably would have happened anyway. That's my point here. It doesn't matter if Cruz, Trump or Rubio gets into the White House the net effect will be the same: the poor in America will be royally screwed. Yes some of the individual polices are different, but the net effect is the same: very bad news if you're not at least upper-middle class. Hitler did the exact opposite. As soon as the Hitler got into power they made life much better for the poor, something the previous Chancellors had completely failed to do. So Hitler's policies were in fact good for Germany - bad for other countries, very bad for minority groups, but good for the domestic Aryans. Sound familiar?
For Religion & Health see:[/b][/size] Williams & Sternthal. (2007). Spirituality, religion and health: Evidence and research directions. Med. J. Aust., 186(10), S47-S50. -LINK
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke
The WIN/Gallup End of Year Survey 2013 found the US was perceived to be the greatest threat to world peace by a huge margin, with 24% of respondents fearful of the US followed by: 8% for Pakistan, and 6% for China. This was followed by 5% each for: Afghanistan, Iran, Israel, North Korea. -LINK
"That's disgusting. There were clean athletes out there that have had their whole careers ruined by people like Lance Armstrong who just bended thoughts to fit their circumstances. He didn't look up cheating because he wanted to stop, he wanted to justify what he was doing and to keep that continuing on." - Nicole Cooke