(March 14, 2016 at 9:12 am)SteveII Wrote: In your rush to the typical "prove it", you are missing the point. It is possible to logically conclude that event x was likely not caused by natural events (and conversely). The only way around this conclusion is to assign a zero probability that supernatural causes exist. This is a claim to knowledge and therefore would require justification and NOT simply shifting the burden of proof to me.
You can have any theory you want but if you can't differentiate your theory from a crackpot theory, then you HAVE a crackpot theory.