(March 15, 2016 at 10:36 am)robvalue Wrote: Nope.
You are not doing science, and you are employing the argument from ignorance.
No, an argument from ignorance is asserting something is true because it has not yet been proven false. Instead, I am using reason and probability theory to determine if an event likely had a natural cause or not. You simply want to assert in the beginning that there is no such thing as supernatural causes--because of your bias--not because of any affirmative proof that none exist.