RE: No constitutional right to consensual BDSM acts?
March 25, 2016 at 1:53 pm
(This post was last modified: March 25, 2016 at 1:54 pm by robvalue.)
Yeah, that's the puzzling thing. Consent was withdrawn. So whether or not what happened before or after that was a "right" or whatever seems to be irrelevant.
Thanks for the further explanation Joe
It would make more sense to me to say you can't legally give verbal consent for [certain really harsh things], just like there are certain rights you can't sign away even if you sign a document saying you are doing just that. But again, in this case, it was the continuation after clear withdrawal of consent that was the problem.
All a bit balmy.
Thanks for the further explanation Joe

It would make more sense to me to say you can't legally give verbal consent for [certain really harsh things], just like there are certain rights you can't sign away even if you sign a document saying you are doing just that. But again, in this case, it was the continuation after clear withdrawal of consent that was the problem.
All a bit balmy.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum