I like the analogies he gives about how the "One being" but "three persons" doesn't make sense to solve the issue but remains contradictory.
Those were strong philosophical analogies. Then he discussed the "mode" "function" interpretation. And he also talks about how Christians through out time tried to explain the trinity philosophically in contradictory ways so there was never a unified view even after 3rd century.
Those were strong philosophical analogies. Then he discussed the "mode" "function" interpretation. And he also talks about how Christians through out time tried to explain the trinity philosophically in contradictory ways so there was never a unified view even after 3rd century.