(April 2, 2016 at 12:37 pm)athrock Wrote:(April 2, 2016 at 9:14 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: Lol, what? That was snark, Athrock.
<snort> Coming from you, easily the Queen of Snark in this forum, that's pretty funny.
(April 2, 2016 at 9:14 am)LadyForCamus Wrote: My point is, you don't (logically) get to make 101 supernatural assertions about God in one breath, and then in the same breath try to compare him to a humanoid, physical world scenario, and expect the analogy to hold.
The Red Sea? (Or "sea of reeds" depending on your interpretation, ofc.) Okay...I didn't realize I was talking to a literalist here...
Do you know what I have learned from this thread? That theists are capable of rationalizing ANYTHING when it comes to God. No matter how ridiculous.
I AM a literalist - which means that I look for the intended meaning of the author. (It's raining cats and dogs means it is raining very hard.)
What you probably meant to say is that I take the scriptures literally. (It's raining cats and dogs means cats and dogs are falling from the sky.)
And you would be wrong about me.
Yes, that is what I meant. Wow, queen of snark on the forum?! I'm not sure how I feel about that title!
Nay_Sayer: “Nothing is impossible if you dream big enough, or in this case, nothing is impossible if you use a barrel of KY Jelly and a miniature horse.”
Wiser words were never spoken.
Wiser words were never spoken.
