The Reasons why "Just Following Jesus" Doesn't work

[Redbeard The Pink]

You hate His word so you hate God.

Lol no. God doesn't exist.


Besides, that doesn't even follow. Even if god did exist and he had actually written that book, hating a book doesn't automatically mean you hate its author. That's just stupid.

You call the God of the bible evil but you don't have a moral standard, that can stand the test of time, to actually make this claim. You worldview can't support evil. You must imagine that there is worth and that there is evil.

The Golden Rule is arguably our oldest moral principle, found in documents that predate the Bible by literally thousands of years. It has been in circulation and practice for virtually all of human history. What part of that makes it seem to you like human moral principles won't stand the test of time?


My views on evil are not motivated by whether humans have intrinsic worth or value. They're motivated by empathy and an understanding of suffering. Actions are not evil because they violate a person's "worth," they're evil because they needlessly inflict suffering and/or detract from the well-being of one or more individuals. My morality is informed by the actual greater good and not some arbitrary list of rules, and that's what makes it better and more useful than yours.

Nothing is solid so this book can't be evil because people from another culture. It would be arrogant for you to use your own social standards to judge them.

You keep going back to this "You don't believe in a creator therefore nothing you believe can be definite," thing, and I have thoroughly explained multiple times why that is an asinine assertion. If you still don't understand, I really don't have anything else to say about that matter. Sprout a brain, already.


The social standards of my time produce objectively better results in terms of human rights and human suffering, so my social standards are objectively better than the Bible. Your book only produces results in the event that your god and your hell actually exist, which you still have yet to demonstrate.

By your worldview people are just animated materials like they were and the way they choose to live is the way they choose to live.

And if they choose to live in a way that is contrary to social morality, they are ostracized and/or punished by society. Sure, that means that the over-arching morality is ultimately what's in charge, but that's been getting consistently better throughout history, and that correlates directly with the decline of religion and the increase in secularism around the globe, especially in government. The last few theocracies left are Muslim ones, and those countries are some of the most backward in terms of human rights. A few hundred years ago, your religion was acting just like that.

Your claim on evil only works if people have intrinsic value and there is an absolute right way and wrong way to treat a person.  It must be given and it must be given by someone who is powerful enough to uphold those standards.

No. It functions on whether a choice will cause unnecessary harm/suffering, which has nothing to do with whether a person has value. Regardless of how much "worth" I place on my own life or someone else's, I still recognize that I don't want to suffer or be harmed and can reason out that I shouldn't inflict those things on others. We've been over this.

You make up your own god by misreading scripture then use your own flawed and arbitrary morals to judge Him. It won't save you. You are blinded by your sin and that blindness will not save you. Just because a blind man can't see the sun doesn't make it not exist and just because you played christian for 20 years doesn't make you right and God wrong.  God isn't imaginary but loving and caring enough to warn you.

You have yet to demonstrate that there's anything to be saved from, or anything to do the saving. If you applied your standard of evidence consistently, you would have to accept testimonies and scriptures from hundreds of religions, virtually all of which contradict your own. If you took the standard of evidence you use for other religions and applied it to yours, you'd see why yours doesn't hold up better than anybody else's.


That's presuming that you've critically evaluated anyone else's religion, of course, rather than simply accepting what your pastor says about them. I sort of think you probably just accept what your pastor says, though, don't you?


And no, the word is "threaten." You're threatening me on behalf of this god, not warning me.

He isn't spiteful towards women or people who are gay. He loves them fiercely enough to die for them in order to make them Holy.

Yes, in the vicarious human blood sacrifice for your war god in your death cult. I know. And yes, he's hostile toward gays and women. Old Testament law makes that pretty clear, and Jesus is pretty clear in the New Testament that not one letter of the law is to be forgotten or changed, and so is Paul. I know you think you can somehow dismiss huge portions of the Old Testament while still keeping things like the (wrong) 10 Commandments, the junk about creation, and a whole mess of other garbage I'm sure you still believe, but those of us who are critical, rational thinkers have to be a little more consistent with how we view bodies of text.

You have taken what societies is currently saying about God and try to indict Him for injustice, but you are only judging yourself.

More religious jargon. Your god doesn't exist, and he's not going to judge me.

Do you fight for the rights of women.[

Is that a question or a statement?


I'm a lover, not a fighter.

Do you seek their purity and holiness?

Those are not real things.

Do you fight for their equality even if it would cause you to die?

See above statement concerning being a lover and not a fighter.

Do you see pass the gay person's sexul orentaion and know that trying to find worth in labels that have been made up.

Yes, and I manage to do it without needing to believe that they'll be tortured forever when they die.

That they are worth more than being bound to lies.

I certainly think people shouldn't bind themselves to lies, and that's why I don't think anyone should bind themselves to your religion or anyone else's.

Do you see them as souls to be loved and cared for people who have worth?

Souls are not real, and the idea of "worth" has little or nothing to do with whether a person should be treated well for reasons I have already outlined twice in this post and elsewhere in this thread.

Not based on how people value the but something that they were born with.

People are born as humans, and that's a trait we share that allows me to empathize with them, and that informs how I treat them. Trying to place "value" on living beings is kind of barbaric in the first place.

The are far more than who they are attracted to that you can't be completed by another person.

I absolutely think they are more than who they are attracted to, whereas your god would be willing to damn them forever for that fact alone, ignoring the rest of their existence. Just another example of how I'm more moral than your god.

That joy isn't found in sex or human companionship.

Joy can be found in all kinds of places: sex, companionship, romance, athletic achievement, financial success...the fact that I can find joy in all these things and you only find joy in your imaginary friend just means my life has more joy in it than yours does, which is yet another reason why my world view is objectively more positive than yours.

God sees people who need saving and makes them aware of what is destroying them that will cause hurt, but you seem to just want to lie to them and say everything is ok.

I certainly don't want people lied to, which is why I'm against religion.

People are in pain and need to know that no matter what they have done or will do God loves them with a scandalous love. A love that would make Him die a humiliating death so that they can receive a love that never lets go. A love that goes beyond death and the grave and that will fill them with hope.

A love that will burn them in hell for eternity unless they blindly accept a story that contradicts mountains of evidence in the very reality that this god supposedly created. Don't forget that part.

He doesn't care what society says, but He moves towards them with love and care. The people he resist are the proud. Those who want to play god and spread lies. Your view of God again shows me that instead of seeking what the Bible actually says you seek to look at the bible with your own social lense. You take your cues from what people say instead of trusting God.

While that isn't true, taking "cues" from real people would still be a better idea than taking them from a fictional character.


Then again, taking cues from people is the reason that you think you're taking cues from a fictional character, so no, I try to avoid just blindly listening to anyone. I go by what the evidence says, and the evidence says that your god is a make-believe being contrived by ancient desert-dwelling scribes who knew no better than the people who used to blame thunder and lightning on Zeus or Thor.