(April 5, 2016 at 1:34 pm)SteveII Wrote:(April 1, 2016 at 11:27 pm)JuliaL Wrote:
In which a deity's "nature" is invoked to avoid the simpler, straightforward explanation that the deity was made up by bronze age clerics and their ancestors and has no existence other than an incoherent concept in the clerics' minds. To counter this, apologists have to stretch, twist and torture logic to get to a point where the deity is no longer the logically inconsistent paradoxical thing described. Even then, they are only able to, under special circumstances, argue that such a being could exist, not give actual evidence that one does.
Although it is trotted out regularly as a "flaw" in the God hypothesis, it is both ignorant and illogical to define omnipotent = do anything.
There is evidence of the existence of God. You just don't believe it. Not my problem. I was merely correcting a theological mistake.
Remember, twice nothing is still nothing.
