(April 10, 2016 at 6:14 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: I also like how, in the story of Sodom, she focuses on the attempted gang rape of the angels (the homosexual hatred angle, as if rapists are the same as homosexuals if they target men), and ignores that Lot offered two of his virgin daughters in their stead.
Now why, if the sin of Sodom was homosexuality and not rape, would Lot think that might be an acceptable solution?
Because in the bible, forcing sex on a women, or what we modern humanists arrogantly call rape, is not a sin against the woman but against her husband. Since there daughters had no husbands and their father saw fit to hand them over, the man in the city were free to do whatever they liked. It's like when you're walking through the grocery store and the salesperson hands you a free sample of frosted marshmallows.
oh she's a she? I really don't know what to think about women who have no problem with the misogyny in the bible. It's o in your face.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
