(April 22, 2016 at 1:05 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(April 22, 2016 at 1:02 pm)TheRocketSurgeon Wrote: This is not REMOTELY what I'm talking about.
I'm talking about a false accusation, the "black man is going to rape your daughters" propaganda that was slanderously/libelously applied to the race, in an attempt to justify bigoted laws against them.
The same thing we're now seeing done with trans people.
Don't try to strawman my argument or deflect it into an arena which I was not even remotely discussing. Yes, the real rapes were happening TO the black community, just as the real rapes are happening TO the trans community. And both horrors are made even worse when the bigots use propaganda to try to make the victims seem like a perpetrator worth oppressing.
I don't see how telling a person that has a penis to use the bathroom for other people with penises is bigoted.
Of course you don't.
Because there are no bathrooms for people with penises. There's a men's room and a women's room.
The symbols look like this:
Perhaps I need to look harder to find the penis in those icons?
Learn the actual definition of gender, as opposed to biological sex (which is what you are describing), and you might understand.
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.