(April 22, 2016 at 1:18 pm)Huggy74 Wrote:(April 22, 2016 at 1:15 pm)FatAndFaithless Wrote: That's the answer I expected from Huggy.
I guess we can't refer to newborns as girls or boys now.
You guys don't realize you are arguing from a position of insanity.
You're 100% missing the point, here, in this little diversion subtopic.
What we're trying to tell you is that there is in fact a difference between the biological sex (penis/vagina), based on the chromosomes the person inherited, and the way their brain develops during the time after conception/birth, such that a measurable difference exists in fMRI scans of trans persons' brains (incredibly, lining up with what they're claiming).
For you to then point at their penis and say, "No! You belong where I say, not where you say!" is to deny exactly what they are, and impose instead upon them your own ideas of the social order. You use things like imaginary rapists and other threats to impose this view upon them, such that they cannot use the restroom because of the very penis they (sometimes/usually) hate and wish to have removed.
You really, honestly can't see how imposing your ideas about their identity upon them isn't bigotry?
You really, honestly can't understand how ignoring their own claims of identity in favor of your presuppositions about them isn't bigotry?
Really?
A Christian told me: if you were saved you cant lose your salvation. you're sealed with the Holy Ghost
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
I replied: Can I refuse? Because I find the entire concept of vicarious blood sacrifice atonement to be morally abhorrent, the concept of holding flawed creatures permanently accountable for social misbehaviors and thought crimes to be morally abhorrent, and the concept of calling something "free" when it comes with the strings of subjugation and obedience perhaps the most morally abhorrent of all... and that's without even going into the history of justifying genocide, slavery, rape, misogyny, religious intolerance, and suppression of free speech which has been attributed by your own scriptures to your deity. I want a refund. I would burn happily rather than serve the monster you profess to love.
