(April 27, 2016 at 2:16 pm)Godschild Wrote:(April 26, 2016 at 3:15 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: It is an objectively correct statement based on the evidence provided by you in this and other threads (like for example your extremely uninformed notion that prayer has an effect). Anomalocaris is correct, and you, as always, are wrong, wrong, wrong.
Now that you brought this up in another thread I'll answer it, you uncaring moron. No one can know how God will answer prayer so any study is just an assumption at best and yes I have seen prayer work and guess what your assumptions don't change a thing.
GC
First of all, shit for brains, I care a hell of a lot more than you, I've actually gone out and done work to help others, given my precious time and sweated for others. Unlike you I don't have conversations with the voices in my head and spew to all and sundry about how great a help I am to them. So next time you want kudos for praying for others go look for it elsewhere, because making no effort cuts no ice here.
Second of all, the study I mentioned was by the Templeton foundation a christian organisation who are looking for scientific evidence for god, and unlike most other christian organisations will publish evidence which hurts their case like the prayer study. I find it deeply satisfying that you will show your true colours and shit all over your fellow christians when they come up wjth somethibg which shows your fantasy world up as a tissue of lies. Oh, and if god did answer prayers you would be able to unambiguously show it either through a mass of impossible events, or through a preponderance of correlations between prayer and unlikely events, "god moves in mysterious ways" is the same as "god does fuck all".
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home