(April 27, 2016 at 2:16 pm)Godschild Wrote:(April 26, 2016 at 3:15 pm)Constable Dorfl Wrote: It is an objectively correct statement based on the evidence provided by you in this and other threads (like for example your extremely uninformed notion that prayer has an effect). Anomalocaris is correct, and you, as always, are wrong, wrong, wrong.
Now that you brought this up in another thread I'll answer it, you uncaring moron. No one can know how God will answer prayer so any study is just an assumption at best and yes I have seen prayer work and guess what your assumptions don't change a thing.
GC
(April 29, 2016 at 1:04 pm)Godschild Wrote:As I said your statement was pure confirmation bias and yet you tried to turn it on atheists inexplicably. Your statement was to the effect that, god was unknowable, except you know it when I see it. You see "god" in things because you really really want there to be some validity to what you fervently believe. And that's fine, go ahead believe all the silly stuff you want. But you are here and are trying very poorly to convince us that your delusions are in fact based on reason, we call you on it and you get all shirty. Its vaguely amusing but a little sad.(April 29, 2016 at 11:45 am)downbeatplumb Wrote: What you said was,
I don't think I have to add anything really as what you said was almost the definition of confirmation bias.
Yes confirming your bias against Christians, my statement was true and not pointed toward anyone but the ones doing a bogus study they have absolutely no control over.
GC
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.