(May 5, 2016 at 9:23 am)abaris Wrote: Yeah, Benghazi. That's a biggy for every credulous idiot on the extreme right.
I expected nothing less. Sometimes your smileys actually backfire like a nuclear device. Not that they wouldn't always go up in your face. The only question is the impact radius.
Hey smart guy, Benghazi was an example of her full capability on foreign policy, her methods of dealing with terrorists, and how she handles failure.
She chose to ignore several hundred emails from the ambassador requesting more troops to stabilize radical Islamist up rising because it was her policy to condemn the usage of that term. She would not even offer support or give direction to the ambassador she simply Ignored him completely That's because his problem directly conflicted with her political idealism concerning islam. Meaning she did not want to look at facts. she wanted to pretend that the world worked in the way she wants it to work. This offer no flexibility in her ability to make policy for this country. If something unexpected happens her track record demonstrates that she ignores it and pretend it has not just happened rather than confronting and dealing with the issue.
This leads us to why she will be weak dealing with terrorists. In that she refuses to identify Jihadists with Islam. Which mean she does not understand how the religion works or she is not willing to alienate the people of that religion as an attack on the Jihadists is an attack on all Sunni Muslims. (90% of all muslims) I personally do not know what is worse. the idea she is too stupid to see how Jihad and 'non radical muslims' are linked or that her political agenda knwingly puts people's lives at risk, just so she can up hold and maintain a utopic idealism. We need a president that will shape things for the future by directly addressing how the world is now, not someone who want to pretend she already lives in that society, and will not deal with what is going on now.
Finally we come to how she deals with failure. Did you know She blamed this youtuber for insighting the riot at the US embassy in Benghazi? Do you know that guy went to jail for making a you tube video? Do you know all of this was on her say so? Did you know she has emails on her personal server as well as texts to her daughter and Benghazi officials that admit to her part in all of this, but at the same time she told the American people a completely different story, which circumvented a citizens 2nd amendment rights and has him sitting in jail for her screw up?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xitCdlo9IlQ
https://www.gop.com/clinton-was-first-of...ube-video/
The fact that she has yet to take any responsibility (meaning accept the full weight of blame and any repercussions the law allows) for her personal server usage with government/official business nor with bengazi makes her a bad leader period.
She show a recklessness and total abandon for our structured system of government, which to me is the core value of a loose canon. What happens when/if this lunatic gets real power? She needs to be sent to prison for her actions not to the highest office in the land
