Nothing is everything.

[Sarcasm]

Flaw in the very beginning of the argument: E=N means that E holds the same value as N. Therefore T, which is E, is also the same value as N. Therefore false that E > N.

Uh, when did i say T > N?

I said E = T because my definition of 'Everything' is 'The Total of All Things'. If your saying that my definition cannot be correct, then please consult the dictionary and the English language. None of my statements prior to this say 'T > N' I dont know what your trying to get at here. Also if you do the math and get 'T > N' BUT you did all the logic or math correctly the only conclusion you get is that the statement T = N faces a contradiction, NOT that my logic was wrong. For example if i want to make a statement that 0 = 1 and someone tries to argue by saying...

1 and 1 is 2 (1 + 1 = 2)

1 and 0 is 1 (1 + 0 = 1)

I Cannot counter this argument by saying that 'Zero' must hold all properties of 'One' therefore this logic is flawed and incorrect. By my statement i am making the 'assumption' not the 'fact' that 0 = 1, Therefore logically if 0 indeed is 1 the properties themselves should be the same without me changing the products when i put in other variables, such as the 0+1 and 1+1. If i indeed DO need to change the other variables in order to come with the same solution this is based on the idea that you are stating 1 = 0 is a 'Fact' not an 'Assumption'.

Further, nothing is one thing. Note, that is 1 thing. Not two, not zero, and five is right out... so that is also a false statement.

By the way by definition 'Nothing' is supposed to say 'No things' if you are saying that 'Nothing' is 'one thing' then why would we have the word 'nothing' in the first place if its supposed to mean 'one thing'? And if N =/= 0 then what DOES equal 0?

You also seemed to miss that i said my definition that 'Nothing' is 'No thing' but at the same time according to your statement 'Nothing' is also 'one thing'. This kinda doesn't make sense, because your saying the word which represents 'No things' also is 'One Thing'.

- Nothing is No Things (N = NT)

- No Things is less than One Thing (NT < 1)

- Nothing is One Thing (N = 1)

- No Things is One Thing (NT = 1)

Properties of NT
NT = 1 and NT < 1

Everything is indeed everything, and there is no contradiction if you are using the proper values for the items listed Tongue

Okay, heres a better way to put it.

By the statements i made, to find the definition of E we must apply the properties of E that were found before, therefore...

Properties of Everything
1>E and E>1

I guess the only thing left is to find something that can be both greater than 1 and less than one at the same time. Have fun finding it.