Dr. Craig is a liar.

[RoadRunner79]

RE:

---

Actually, my understanding is; that is part of the argument for a personal cause or one capable of intention. And if time is relational to the physical world, and not separate, then also for a non-physical cause.

The questions, and I don't think we have any point of reference to answer them, is can a non-physical entity act outside of time.  However, if the evidence points to a beginning of time, then I think that the answer has to be yes.   Otherwise we wouldn't be asking the question "why is there something; rather than nothing".

---

How did you come to that conclusion?

That -is- a wonderful question....isn't it.......

can a non-physical entity act outside of time.  However, if the evidence points to a beginning of time, then I think that the answer has to be yes.   Otherwise we wouldn't be asking the question "why is there something; rather than nothing".

...now I'd go even farther, and ask how you came to string those sentences together in the first place?  What relationship do you think they have to each other...what is the means of inference you would use to go from any one of them, to any other?

You are making the argument, that there can be no change, outside of time. If this is true, and their was a beginning of time, then we would be in the same state as that point. Time could have never began, because your argument doesn't allow for any change.