(April 12, 2011 at 7:42 am)Dotard Wrote:Not all opposing viewpoints are equally valid. Does not tolerating someone who hates an entire group by generalizing them all based upon their insecurities and fears make me a bigot? I don't have the answer to that but if it is yes, then label me a bigot. Each person should be judged individually, not summed up as a whole based on their sexual persuasion.(April 12, 2011 at 5:44 am)FaithNoMore Wrote: If not being prejudicial means tolerating all view points, even the retarded ones, then I choose to be a prejudice asshole.
You chose not to tolerate other views, even calling them 'retarded' and that is not bigoted?
And the whole health issue is a smokescreen. If people were really concerned about health issues they would be passing out condoms and trying to educate people. Instead they're out there trying to steal the rights from homosexuals and condemming them. You can dress up hate however you want but it's still hate.
Even if the open windows of science at first make us shiver after the cozy indoor warmth of traditional humanizing myths, in the end the fresh air brings vigor, and the great spaces have a splendor of their own - Bertrand Russell
