RE: The difference between a sceptic and a non-sceptic
May 17, 2016 at 7:20 am
(This post was last modified: May 17, 2016 at 7:26 am by robvalue.)
Okay, fair enough. Perhaps "conclusions" would be a better word?
It's kind of circular, in that to have a (reasonably strong) belief you must have what you consider to be enough evidence for that belief, in some form. You may not actually be able to identify the evidence, however.
I always try and consider if I have enough evidence to convince someone else. If I don't, then I'm suspicious of my own conclusion.
It's kind of circular, in that to have a (reasonably strong) belief you must have what you consider to be enough evidence for that belief, in some form. You may not actually be able to identify the evidence, however.
I always try and consider if I have enough evidence to convince someone else. If I don't, then I'm suspicious of my own conclusion.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum


