RE: Near death experience of Howard Storm
May 26, 2016 at 7:43 pm
(This post was last modified: May 26, 2016 at 7:44 pm by Simon Moon.)
(May 25, 2016 at 10:54 pm)scoobysnack Wrote:(May 24, 2016 at 10:39 pm)dom.donald Wrote: Well, I must admit, I haven't read every page of this thread.
But my immediate thoughts was:
If this guy had grown up in Indonesia, I wonder if he would have met angels, Jesus, or God in his "NDE"?
Anyone could have made up this shit. Most of us don't have the balls to do that and then try and sell it. Or we're not mad enough. So one guy does, one anomaly, and we're all supposed to take his word for it and use it as evidence that God exists? Give me a break.
There are thousands of stories like this. The sooner people accept the better. God exists, and everyone at the top levels knows this.
Yes, there are thousands of stories like this.
You know why?
Because humans all have basically the same brain, that will act in very similar ways to each other when under the stress of almost dying.
People that have NDE's in other cultures DO NOT see Jesus. They see the religious iconography of the religion that they were raised in.
Quote:They also know if they can suppress it, people will look to the state as god, and if no god exists, then we are just animals, and there is no higher purpose than what the elite want us to think. It's actually easier to manipulate the godless because there are no moral absolutes, so they can change society and values a lot easier. At the top, they all worship lucifer, at least for the most part, because Lucifer gives them the temporary power they desire while here. They don't push love, they are at war with us right now.
The rest of this is nothing but unsupported assertions, in the guise of some pretty wack paranoid ramblings.
You'd believe if you just opened your heart" is a terrible argument for religion. It's basically saying, "If you bias yourself enough, you can convince yourself that this is true." If religion were true, people wouldn't need faith to believe it -- it would be supported by good evidence.