Poor Elizabeth Warren.

[dyresand]

No.  It is not presumptuous when someone who knows what they are talking about speaks.

You should try it sometime.


http://www.nytimes.com/2016/06/02/us/pol....html?_r=0

William Weld, the vice-presidential nominee for the Libertarian Party, said Wednesday that he believed Hillary Clinton had done nothing “criminal” in using personal email as secretary of state.

He was equally succinct when asked if her use of a private email server, now the subject of an F.B.I. investigation, was a legitimate issue.

“No,” said Mr. Weld, a former prosecutor, adding that he had read of no evidence that would clear the bar for criminality. “I think it’s a nonstarter.”

You have five more days to jerk off to your wet dream.

Min there is a big difference she can get charged with Espionage because of said sensitive data and its already to late for her to stay in the race
half of the voters in the US believed she broke the law with that private server. 
http://www.ibtimes.com/hillary-clinton-e...al-2376607

Then you have the Inspectors Generals report refuting all of Hillary's defenses for using said server.
http://reason.com/archives/2016/06/02/hi...es-refuted


So lets go over what she did wrong here

Executive Order 13526 and 18 U.S.C Sec. 793(f) Section 1236.22 FOIA 
She broke all of those. The first two being broken is serious and can land you in federal prision. 
The Second all records must be kept preserved apart of the federal record keeping. That being said she had classified information on said server to look back at the first. The Third thing her system was made to defy the FOIA (Freedom of information action) and all of this because she wanted to use her own personal email account..... simple as put she broke federal law enough said. I say this not because i am anti Hillary i am just stating the facts she broke the law enough said.