(June 9, 2016 at 4:41 pm)abaris Wrote:(June 9, 2016 at 4:35 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: We require children to be inoculated before they're admitted to schools, for the safety of the wider population. Do you also oppose that?
There's a very big difference between the two and if you reflect on it, I'm sure you notice.
Maybe it's because I'm coming from a part of the world where eugenics were all the rage for a pretty long period in time, but I'm certainly opposed to inflict irreversible damage to someone else's body.
A lesser known fact, Switzerland made what they considered imbeciles or irresponsible (mostly women) infertile up until the late 70ies. Against their will.
See my responses above. My argument is not against inoculations being required, but rather asking, where is the line of what is and isn't unusual?
As I've made plain above, I in no way support the idea of physical castration. I won't address that point again.
