We do have evidence for a world wide flood. What those who say we do not have evidence are looking for is what is called a coastal or fluvial flood. this is where sediment and debris is pushed in land or away from a source like a lake or river and deposits debris all along the way. There is another type of flood call a pluvial flood that is slow and saturating very little is displaced.
If you read the flood account it describes all 3 happening. so near the coasts and rivers there is indeed much evidence for a great flood in the time frame discussed, and in the areas where a pluvial flood would have taken place we have exactly what we would expect to find.
But, stoo-ped people assume all floods cascade and push debris away from water sources. So what if the ground simply saturated and the water level rose?
The would be the difference between taking a bucket of muddy water and debris and dumping it out, allowing the mud and muck to go where it wants, and taking that same size bucket poke a few holes in it, and over a 40 day period saturating the mud/dirt slowly and then letting it dry out at it's own pace.
Both will show evidence of flood if you care to look at it according to how the flood took place.
Only a fool looks at the saturated bucket and say it never flooded because it does not look like the first bucket.
If you read the flood account it describes all 3 happening. so near the coasts and rivers there is indeed much evidence for a great flood in the time frame discussed, and in the areas where a pluvial flood would have taken place we have exactly what we would expect to find.
But, stoo-ped people assume all floods cascade and push debris away from water sources. So what if the ground simply saturated and the water level rose?
The would be the difference between taking a bucket of muddy water and debris and dumping it out, allowing the mud and muck to go where it wants, and taking that same size bucket poke a few holes in it, and over a 40 day period saturating the mud/dirt slowly and then letting it dry out at it's own pace.
Both will show evidence of flood if you care to look at it according to how the flood took place.
Only a fool looks at the saturated bucket and say it never flooded because it does not look like the first bucket.
