(June 16, 2016 at 1:21 pm)KevinM1 Wrote:(June 16, 2016 at 12:59 pm)Rhythm Wrote: They don't know what isis and al qaeda are talking about...they know what they're talking about, lol..it's just hard to figure out what it was..because they're dumb.
The man aligned himself, spectacularly, to islamists (who do, as it so happens, hate the west - they're almost defined by it). That was clearly important to him even if a full understanding of the respective groups and their differences wasn't.
Even so, the point remains that he chose Pulse rather than any other soft target so readily available to him in one of the world's most famous tourist towns. I mean, even if you look at it through the lens of "He wanted to attack the West," it's pretty obvious that what he was attacking was our acceptance of LGBT people. Maybe the West was abstractly targeted, but these people died and got shot simply because of their sexuality.
What I find amusing is Drich trying to call foul on the LGBT community for using the tragedy to call for certain kinds of political actions when that's simply what happens in the face of tragedy. It's not like Republicans haven't been beating the drum against that community for, well, ever, or that they've fought against any firearm regulations for the past 15-20 years.
Remember, the guy was an Afghan even though he was born in the US. That's important because almost every Afghan male is a practicing homosexual or has been raped by one as a child. In the shooter's case he was a practicing homosexual although he had been married twice.
So, you have a self-hating homosexual who has ties to a national homosexual culture and who has a Taliban-loving father blabbing about how the US screwed over Afghanistan. It's no wonder the guy became a homicidal maniac. The question is how many others like him are waiting their turn to go on a rampage? They might be muslims but they love their boy toys. They even get a herd of them when they go to paradise. Maybe that's why the women will still be virgins.