RE: Why the religious will never admit you won the argument (and why they don't care)
June 24, 2016 at 9:08 am
(June 24, 2016 at 7:57 am)Mister Agenda Wrote:SteveII Wrote:LOL. Fine. You won. You have set out to prove why you are superior and theist are ignorant. Of course you don't have any idea how to defend what it is you believe, but since you are confident you are on the right side...you win! Congrats.
Since hundred of millions, if not billions of theists accept biological evolution as a fact, your poor showing as a follower of the ID sub-branch of Creationism (which has never been able to propose an unsolvable instance of 'irreducible complexity') hardly demonstrates that theists are ignorant.
I find that anything with the word system in it is largely irreducibly complex. The cardiovascular system for instance. Which came first, the pump, the plumbing, the fluid in the system. Not to mention, that this is a transport system for other systems (just pumping blood through the body isn't sufficient). It even comes with it's own repair system, so when a feed or return line breaks, it is automatically patched (within reason) It is a closed loop system, with feedback, and control modification for when demands change.
As an engineer, I wonder how many trials unguided evolution had to go through, before the return lines made it back to the heart (or all the lines connected at all)? How many times did a version appear, where the system became bypassed? Which came first, the heart, or the control systems, that power and regulate it?
I agree with this post at uncommon descent http://www.uncommondescent.com/intellige...o-a-whale/
Let's start putting some numbers to the claims, and see if they make sense!