Why the religious will never admit you won the argument (and why they don't care)

[Mister Agenda]

So how does not being able to resolve evolutionary history to a 'nice, neat little tree' falsify evolution again?

I don't think that it does.   But it does question some of the claims, when you look at all the evidence.

Which claims?

Bearing in mind that a claim by a scientist does not equal a 'claim made by evolution'. The central claim of evolution is that speciation is due to natural selection acting on hereditary variations between organisms. Some zoologist thinking the scarlet toe nibbler being more closely related to the blooming onion gorger than to the soft-bellied seersucker and turning out to be wrong would not be an example of a problem with the theory of evolution.