(April 25, 2011 at 7:38 pm)Aerzia Saerules Arktuos Wrote:Void Wrote:So you're fine with killing someone to further your own agenda given that:
1. You are in a bad position and
2. They are in a position much better than your own
How can you possibly justify that as a moral decision?
How can you not justify that as a moral decision? Morality is what we make of it... what sort of ridiculous meter of 'how x' morals must be are you using that I am not?
Quote:So because you lost all your wealth in a freak accident, and this man gained all his wealth through, say, the lottery, it would become "fair" for you to murder him? Why? Because you worked hard and gained fuck all in return? How exactly is that "fair"?
Also, someone who wins the lottery deserves "nothing"? Not even their life?
Fairness is receiving what you put out. If you put out and receive nothing: that is unfair.
Deservence is a measure of how much you put out. If someone wins a lottery, they put out next to nothing for it... they do not deserve any of that money.
Life isn't fair though.
jesus tapdancing christ Sae! If I were one of your friends I would NEVER let you walk behind me with a weapon. god only knows what you'd do if you decided you could gain something by committing an act that only you deem morally justified.
I already had you graded at a D- on the "morality scale", but I gotta tell you, I think I have to downgrade you to an F. Mostly because ... you're completely serious.