No I wouldn't. But hypotheticals such as this are missing the key components of reality and context (ie the modern society in which we live). If we wound the clock back a few hundred thousands years (when modern humans foought for survival) then the 'moral' landscape (whatever morality means) would probably not be the same.
But set in todays times. I would not murder someone solely for my own financial gain, I would just not do it for my own sake rather than any deep moral meaning. Why would I want to carry this emotional burden around? I would do it, if I had a better reason (such as revenge, self defence) for an equal harm they had/would done/do to me/my family. The fear of detection and level of financial gain is not relevant to the decision.
But set in todays times. I would not murder someone solely for my own financial gain, I would just not do it for my own sake rather than any deep moral meaning. Why would I want to carry this emotional burden around? I would do it, if I had a better reason (such as revenge, self defence) for an equal harm they had/would done/do to me/my family. The fear of detection and level of financial gain is not relevant to the decision.
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.