(June 29, 2016 at 11:01 am)Veritas_Vincit Wrote:(June 29, 2016 at 10:14 am)SteveII Wrote: Would God know of a better solution: yes, certainly.
Could a nation of loosely grouped tribes create a centralized government that was capable of providing a safety net for the poor and refugee camps (with a long-term resettlement plan) for the displaced after a military campaign? Highly unlikely.
To make your point, you can't simply say "God could have...". It is not that easy--you would have to give a plausible scenario. You also did not make the case that God condones slavery. Since the penalty of kidnapping and selling someone into slavery was death, the goal of the system was obviously not for slavery itself. The best thing for the greatest number of people seems to have been to regulate a practice that had been going on for literally thousands of years.
So let me get this straight. You're saying that the best solution that the all loving, all knowing, all powerful creator of the universe can come up with to deal with people keeping slaves is to... tell them to keep slaves on his own authority, tell them who they can enslave, how they can keep them as property to be passed down, how to turn a 7-year slave into a permanent slave, and that it's fine to beat a slave with a rod as long as he doesn't die within two days.
That's it? That's your moral law giver? That's the best he can do?
That's just pathetic.
I didn't expect you to actually discuss this...I was not disappointed. Do you realize that your responses are not thoughtful whatsoever? You don't want to have a discussion--you want everyone to hear your inch-deep thoughts and be congratulated by similar people for you laser insight. When a point is made that requires a counterpoint...nothing but either 1) mocking incredulity and restate your original point, 2) parrot back someone else's response or 3) change the subject.