Sounds like the jury was spot on with its decision about wrongful termination and chose to swerve the matter of whether Churchill should get meaningful compensation or his job back.
As regards what he wrote, the analogy was unfortunate because it detracts from the argument he was putting forward.
As regards what he wrote, the analogy was unfortunate because it detracts from the argument he was putting forward.
A man is born to a virgin mother, lives, dies, comes alive again and then disappears into the clouds to become his Dad. How likely is that?
