(April 27, 2011 at 12:23 pm)Eleazar Wrote: (which is not an argument for the existence of God, but an argument that the demand for a proof of God's existence that does not presuppose God's existence begs the question)
It does beg a very fine question, to which any non-flippant answer is not "god"
(April 27, 2011 at 12:23 pm)Eleazar Wrote: My argument will work for any being that both necessarily exists and upon whose existence everything else depends. So if there are any gods on that list that satisfy those criteria, then sure, the argument holds for those gods as well. But what is the problem with that?
The problem is broadly similar to "My argumant works on any day the argument is dictated by my personal decree to work"
