Let's see how many apologetics take the bait

[Pat Mustard]

God was speaking to one man (when he was given everything to eat)

Verse God giving rules for religious worship.

So then god wasn't planning on putting anymore people on the earth?
Not to mention neither verse quoted has anything to do with religious worship.
You can't expect anyone to believe that the bible is to be taken literally (because you've done that before), when it now seems you're putting a figurative spin on it.

Favourite tactic of christian apologists, "the bible is the inerrant word of god which is a totally accurate depiction of the world every single word of which cannot be discounted, except for the bits I don't agree with, and the bits which show the bible a contradictory mess of bullshit, those are not true, unless I need them to be so".

Or to put the matter in other words:

To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again, and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself – that was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink.