Live stream of Dem Convention.

[ReptilianPeon]

---

I said Trump is the easiest Republican to beat too but people thought I was crazy. I'm sure the Clintons encouraged (not saying he's a plant, just that they really wanted him to run) their close friend Donald to run in the hopes of splitting the Republican party and giving them an easy win (even if he happened to win the primary withouit splitting the primary because he's so incompetent).

Donald amazed everyone by winning the nomination. And I doubt Hilary  expected to be losing to Trump in the national polling. Donald Trump of all people! Anyone else would have a much bigger lead than Trump because they're way more competent and have the support of the majority of the Republican establishment

I'd have wished for Rand Paul. He would crush Hilary. I don't get why more people didn't vote for Rand in the primaries - he was most likable candidate. Though the Republican elites would probably treat him like the DNC treated Senator Sanders (i.e. like they treated Ron Paul). If it were Hilary and Rand as the respective nominees I'd have no trouble voting Republican.

Fuck Rand Paul! So a gay person can get married and smoke pot? Is that how you think worker stability works? Nope, still a form of economic Ayn Rand "fuck you I got mine".

Long before these primaries started, and something both republicans and libertarians ignore are billionaire voices like Nick Hanauer who would say you are full of shit, and you cant simply let the pay gap keep exploding. WORKERS not the uber rich, but workers make up the bulk of the buying public. The less they make the less they spend. The less they spend, the less people go through a business's doors. WORKERS not the rich, are the job creators. No business owner will hire a new employee unless the demand forces them too, so it is extremely important to VALUE the economic stability and buying power of the majority of society, which is NOT the uber rich.

If you think keeping wages low or lowering wages more works, all you have to do is visit India which has a much bigger poverty population, or go work in a Chinese sweat shop factory. That may be your idea of global competition, a race to the bottom, but it will NEVER be mine. The bullshit about higher wages forcing companies to outsource isn't about survival, it is about greed and total lack of responsibility to INVEST in the country you get rich in.

"We cant afford it" is bullshit, that is nothing but Corporate blackmail. If anyone wants me to feel sorry for the Walmart family, or the Koch Brothers or oil companies rich CEOs you can forget it. There are rich people who DO understand the value of workers, but we don't have enough. Libertarians being right on social issues does not make them less republican economically, in fact to me they are simply more gas on the fire.

"We're willing to create more poverty wages but at least we include gays and pot smokers". BULLSHIT.

---

Pretty much any Democrat would be better than Hilary. There are more things I agree with Libertarians on than I do with Hilary - in particular their wanting to end foreign interventions. It's actually really hard to know what Hilary actually stands for because she's so good at being a chameleon. She wants to be president for herself and nobody else. It's all for her ego.

I'm subscribed to Ron Paul's YouTube page, and he seems like reasonable fellow between >50% of the time (but nowhere near 100% because I can't agree with anyone on everything). At least Rand doesn't proudly wear flip-flops - in fact he recently proposed a bill to end the military draft which I liked the sound of.

Would a republican have legalized gay marriage?

Yes, actually, certain Republicans have no problems with homosexuals. The Pauls (Rand and Ron) have served as Republicans, but being Libertarians they have no problems with homosexuals. Funny how you go around throwing insults and yet it is you who are the ignorant and stupid one.

What does bother me is that you are basically stating that you will not vote for either party.

Why is this a problem? You don't own anybody's vote.

What you all need to understand is that from a very logical standpoint, at this time we are not capable of electing a third party member.

So? If third parties grow then they can affect change in the bigger parties. In fact, California's new election rules mean that it is advisable to appeal to third party voters. I'll let the below video explain it better than I can:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEu1RICoEc4

A third party vote is a waste, a vote that could have been used for the lesser of the two evils.

You seem to be repeating yourself here. Plus, I've shown you how it's not necessarily a waste.

If Trump wins, you can bet that I am going to blame all of you idiots who were too fucking dumb to understand how politics works.

You certainly don't win over people by insulting them. That's what people who masturbate to Hilary Clinton need to understand. If Hilary loses she only has herself to blame.

Hilary is a piece of poo. She's a terrible candidate and because she's so arrogant she things this election will be easy for her. I'm not going to tell you should shouldn't masturbate to her - I'm not in the business of calling people I disagree with idiots or stupid after all. However, what I will reiterate is how the Clinton Cronies think they are all so smart and then turns out they are the ignorant ones.

After all, it has been consistently shown that democrats are for the people. They can never give us everything we want, but when they do, it is epic. I thought I was going to die without seeing gay marriage legalized, after all.

We must not be living on the same timeline. I'll let Jill Stein of the Green Party explain why the Democrats (at a national level at least) are not for the people:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4Tz7o5gZwE