What annoys me the most is when people try to define "God" so that it necessarily exists. That is really pathetic. They then use their definition as "evidence".
In fact, it's "evidence" that they are exploring their imagination and nothing more. So much of theism is circular; more so when religion gets involved.
I've even heard deists sort-of say that "no cause at all for our reality" could be a possible definition of "God". But that still makes the assumption that there is even a placeholder for a cause/non cause and not instead an eternal reality.
In fact, it's "evidence" that they are exploring their imagination and nothing more. So much of theism is circular; more so when religion gets involved.
I've even heard deists sort-of say that "no cause at all for our reality" could be a possible definition of "God". But that still makes the assumption that there is even a placeholder for a cause/non cause and not instead an eternal reality.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum