I agree that, as far as I know, "multiverses" is a currently untestable hypothesis. Our resident scientists will probably be able to add more to that.
It does at least offer some sort of model or mechanism (I think), whereas "God" just puts the problem back one step. If complex existence requires an intelligent creator as an explanation, then "God" also requires such an explanation; unless "God" is somehow assumed to be much simpler than its creation. We'd just be dealing with an intelligent being in some sort of parent reality, and we'd be facing exactly the same situation.
It does at least offer some sort of model or mechanism (I think), whereas "God" just puts the problem back one step. If complex existence requires an intelligent creator as an explanation, then "God" also requires such an explanation; unless "God" is somehow assumed to be much simpler than its creation. We'd just be dealing with an intelligent being in some sort of parent reality, and we'd be facing exactly the same situation.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum