RE: The real religion?
August 9, 2016 at 2:27 am
(This post was last modified: August 9, 2016 at 2:29 am by robvalue.)
Also, the assumptions made by science are not generally dangerous either.
For example, assuming what we observe is in some way "real" is not harmful. If it turns out that it's not real, then what has anyone lost?
Assuming predictive models validated by evidence are useful is again not harmful, and is also self correcting.
I'm thinking of doing another video about my thoughts on the word "real" at some point. It's a very difficult word.
For example, assuming what we observe is in some way "real" is not harmful. If it turns out that it's not real, then what has anyone lost?
Assuming predictive models validated by evidence are useful is again not harmful, and is also self correcting.
I'm thinking of doing another video about my thoughts on the word "real" at some point. It's a very difficult word.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum