(August 15, 2016 at 5:11 pm)Alex K Wrote:(August 15, 2016 at 5:07 pm)Anomalocaris Wrote: No. You have to single out one criterion on an ad hoc basis to deflect the implication of a counterexample to an broad initial claim that did not originally specify the criterion. I don't think Lek's criterion was selected on an ad hoc basis.
Me neither. It is quite believable that he thought all along that perpetrating or condoning the murder of millions was incompatible with the message of Christ, and didn't just add that particular thing ad hoc when he was confronted with an alleged follower of Christ who did.
I'm tired of this, Christians commit hate crimes all the time and the Catholic churches intolerance of the Jewish people goes all the way back to the inquisition and before. besides your "message of Christ" condones the hatred and murder of gays, lesbians , and unbelievers not only by openly stating that they should be burned alive but by clear statement that your "god" will condemn them to torture and therefore, wants them to be tortured. as a result I think its safe to say your "message of Christ" is to condone the torture and murder of millions.
![[Image: jha7gg.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=oi62.tinypic.com%2Fjha7gg.jpg)