RE: What God is to the Universe is what your mind is to your body
August 18, 2016 at 7:56 am
(This post was last modified: August 18, 2016 at 8:03 am by Thumpalumpacus.)
(August 17, 2016 at 11:10 pm)fdesilva Wrote:(August 17, 2016 at 12:11 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: Given that mind is an emergent property of a brain that is part of a body, you're belaboring the obvious. But you're also miscategorizing the requirement. Fact is, comatose women have been kept on life-support so that they could bring their fetus to term (http://www.medicaldaily.com/life-support...aby-389238, http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/04/br...33381.html, and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Susan_Torres).
In this case it needed even more minds Doctors Nurses etc
(August 17, 2016 at 12:11 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: You'll need to demonstrate that need. Simply repeating it is not demonstration.
The Mind cannot be an emergent property. My reasons are given on this thread
http://atheistforums.org/thread-44629.html
Citing yourself to support a bald claim is not very convincing.
(August 17, 2016 at 11:10 pm)fdesilva Wrote: A more detail account on
http://tianweb.com/Event%20to%20Dualism.pdf
Philosophical claptrap accompanied by a gross misunderstanding of physics, not to mention citing yourself again to support your own claims. Bring me facts, and quit spamming the boards with your self-promotion.
(August 17, 2016 at 11:10 pm)fdesilva Wrote: http://philpapers.org/rec/DESCAS
*yawn* More philosophical claptrap, more self-promotion, and still no facts?
Bring me facts.
While we're at it, would you learn how to use quote tags? I'm tired of having to fish your replies out of text ascribed to me -- and further, if you're not even smart enough to master simple software, why should I think you're smart enough to have answer to questions such as they one we're discussing?
