(August 19, 2016 at 7:33 am)Rhythm Wrote: Yes, you do, and contending that you do not is beneath you. Everytime I (or anyone else) reference something about psychogeny that nuerology helped us to discover...you go on about how brainwaving isn't sufficient (and frankly..you don;t even need any prodding..you'll launch into it of your own accord).It's not only insufficient, it's not even relevant to the question at hand. Nobody has argued against neurology, neuropsychology or science. What I'm arguing is that you do not know WHAT about the brain allows for qualia, and that some levels of organization aren't unique to the brain.
Quote: A psychogeny sans nuerology is, itself, an empty set within the context of our current understanding of mind, and what evidence is available. Mind comes from...wait for it.....-the brain-. I'm not going to humor your request that I produce evidence of that, you're aware of it...you must be, to consider it unsatisfying to begin with.
The qualitative human mental experience is for sure of the brain. The existence of mind rather than the lack of existence of mind is not demonstrably so. I'd call that qualitative experience "psychology," and the existential question "psychogony."
