RE: Islam scientific miracles again
August 22, 2016 at 12:19 pm
(This post was last modified: August 22, 2016 at 12:22 pm by huss97ein.)
(August 22, 2016 at 1:31 am)robvalue Wrote: I always have the same answer to this.After a good research it's not even true the number isn't fix and even the number of bones isn't too it's just a figure used because it has two values an approximate number of joints which varies between 300-400 and also the degree of movement of the most important joints like the hip and the shoulder and now they regret it lol [FACE WITH TEARS OF JOY][FACE WITH TEARS OF JOY]
Let's say they knew something that it seems unlikely they would know. What does that tell us about how they knew it?
Nothing. It tells us nothing about how they knew it. The source is a further claim, which requires its own evidence. Saying its "from God" or whatever is just the argument from ignorance (you can't prove me wrong so I'm right).
As it happens, they didn't know anything surprising. They knew what you'd expect a bunch of people back then to know, and the rest is people feverishly retrofitting later scientific discoveries.
And also... one section of a book being true does not imply the whole book is true either. Even if that bit was inspired by a deity.
Sorry to waste your time it's just another hoax [FACE WITH COLD SWEAT]
Sent from my SM-N920C using Tapatalk