islam doesnt preach eye for an eye....
it preaches it is better to forgive...as was the case for raymon davis, and if the victims family forgive, then the 'criminal' should reward them healthily, not pay them to let you off (blood money) what most people assume and label, although there is a fine line between them.
Mr Rayaan, islamic law doesnt say stoning for adultry, this was a universal law over 1000yrs ago and may have been used by past islamic governments, as it was used by past indian, christian and the rest of the worlds governments too over 1000yrs ago.
Islamic law is designed to be flexible depending on the state of the people, if society is crumbling then laws should be more harsh, as was the case in afghanistan after russian war, if society is civil then laws can be relaxed.
Islamic law does oppose lenghty prison sentences as this is costly to the state, and will not rehabilitate the criminal, but will only worsen their mental state, as your own stats prove, over 90% re-offend, and costs the state over $3billion annually (lower end of estimate).
people use the practices of old islamic empires to justify or implement these rules today, but someone show me a verse in the quraan which prescribes stoning or death for adultry? it just says it is a sin, as is backbiting, murder and stealing a 1p mojo.
Its funny how everyone opposes the eye for eye theorum, but you were all jumping for joy when USA wanted to invade afghanistan and iraq, and youll be jumping for joy when they try to invade iran too....how come no-one said anything about eye for an eye then? when your the victim, all you can think about is eye for eye..and you cant blame a victim of such a horrific crime to want the prepetrator blind or dead. Personally i think people like that have no plave in society, at the very least they should be banished.
maybe iran could invade england, and make it like australia, a place to ship all the criminals....
- wouldnt that be lovely, they could join our police force, they cant be much worse than the cops here.
by your governments own admission, the wars were based on falsified, exagerated and manipulated 'evidence' for weapons of mass destruction. FBI didnt even list bin laden as wanted for 9/11 because there was no evidence, but it was ok to invade afghanistan and iraq and 10 yrs later still deploying more troops, and 10 yrs later, you will still be deploying more troops (not your own children tho), and still be supporting the war.
500,000 iraqi babies have died directly due to the sanctions BEFORE the war, but its a price worht paying to 'liberate' the iraqi people. And its ok to use depleted uraniuim even though scientific research AND evidence has shown it to be responsible for the most horrifying birth defects...
it preaches it is better to forgive...as was the case for raymon davis, and if the victims family forgive, then the 'criminal' should reward them healthily, not pay them to let you off (blood money) what most people assume and label, although there is a fine line between them.
Mr Rayaan, islamic law doesnt say stoning for adultry, this was a universal law over 1000yrs ago and may have been used by past islamic governments, as it was used by past indian, christian and the rest of the worlds governments too over 1000yrs ago.
Islamic law is designed to be flexible depending on the state of the people, if society is crumbling then laws should be more harsh, as was the case in afghanistan after russian war, if society is civil then laws can be relaxed.
Islamic law does oppose lenghty prison sentences as this is costly to the state, and will not rehabilitate the criminal, but will only worsen their mental state, as your own stats prove, over 90% re-offend, and costs the state over $3billion annually (lower end of estimate).
people use the practices of old islamic empires to justify or implement these rules today, but someone show me a verse in the quraan which prescribes stoning or death for adultry? it just says it is a sin, as is backbiting, murder and stealing a 1p mojo.
Its funny how everyone opposes the eye for eye theorum, but you were all jumping for joy when USA wanted to invade afghanistan and iraq, and youll be jumping for joy when they try to invade iran too....how come no-one said anything about eye for an eye then? when your the victim, all you can think about is eye for eye..and you cant blame a victim of such a horrific crime to want the prepetrator blind or dead. Personally i think people like that have no plave in society, at the very least they should be banished.
maybe iran could invade england, and make it like australia, a place to ship all the criminals....
- wouldnt that be lovely, they could join our police force, they cant be much worse than the cops here.by your governments own admission, the wars were based on falsified, exagerated and manipulated 'evidence' for weapons of mass destruction. FBI didnt even list bin laden as wanted for 9/11 because there was no evidence, but it was ok to invade afghanistan and iraq and 10 yrs later still deploying more troops, and 10 yrs later, you will still be deploying more troops (not your own children tho), and still be supporting the war.
500,000 iraqi babies have died directly due to the sanctions BEFORE the war, but its a price worht paying to 'liberate' the iraqi people. And its ok to use depleted uraniuim even though scientific research AND evidence has shown it to be responsible for the most horrifying birth defects...
