(September 4, 2016 at 4:40 pm)Yeauxleaux Wrote:(September 4, 2016 at 4:13 pm)CapnAwesome Wrote: That woman probably grew up in a fundamentalist Muslim community (which is most of who wear burkinis). Her whole life: She's been told that she'll burn in hell if she disobey's Islamic law, she's been told to always obey her father as part of that law, then told to always obey her husband. She's been told (in the best case scenario) that her family and community will disown her if she leaves Islam. She's been forced by her family to dress a certain way since puberty and before she was 18. Probably married extremely young.
Choice being made by herself is only is only in the very loosest of sense. Meanwhile how is her Husband dressed? Islam supposedly mandates modesty from both sexes, but 9 times out of 10 her husband is in western clothes, able to enjoy himself on the beach like a normal human. Although I don't believe in banning it, I can thoroughly say 'fuck the Burkini.'
I'm not saying none of this is true
Although I don't know how much I see that "the woman is covered while the man is Western" thing, if I'm honest. Typically, when I see a Muslim woman fully burka'd out (I'm talking the full black tent, with the letter-box face covering), her husband is in the traditional dress as well. I do normally see that.
But hey, if you see what you said about the husband being dressed normally while she's in a full black curtain, feel free to point it out and discuss it. I'm not saying we're not allowed to have an opinion, to comment, to discuss it. I think the subject actually needs an open dialogue if we're going to discourage it, but we can't force it.
What you can't do is police the issue and literally force a Muslim woman to strip down, and just for other peoples' comfort rather than her own too. Completely regardless of whether she started wearing the hijab by social pressure or by her own choice, she is probably used to dressing like that, and suddenly forcing her to strip in public is very embarrassing and uncomfortable for her.
I'll be honest, I actually do hate the idea behind hijab. I genuinely do think it's a horrible oppressive idea, that a woman must completely cover herself in public just to not sexually arouse men. It is victim-blaming shit. However, like I said earlier, it's something you have to gradually discourage in a natural way through open conversation and narratives. Shoe-horning your opinions onto everyone through forced laws isn't going to suddenly change peoples' minds overnight.
I think you are me are pretty much in agreement, especially on your last paragraph. That's why I don't think a ban is practical. Bans of anything rarely have the desired effect.
I just wanted to point out that choice comes from more then what the law mandates. These women rarely have freedom of choice as to what to wear. The consequences that they would normally suffer from their families for not covering up are normally far greater then those they would suffer from the french government for covering up. Although I never though I'd see the day when a government forced women to wear less clothes. In Israel recently a concert performer was told to put on more modest clothing at the beach(http://www.nytimes.com/2016/08/29/world/....html?_r=0) . Also I wanted to show that you can be against the ban on practicality issues and still be fully opposed to the Burkina and everything is represents.
![[Image: dcep7c.jpg]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=i46.tinypic.com%2Fdcep7c.jpg)