RE: Church demands the victim apologize to pastor's wife since the pastor did the rape.
September 11, 2016 at 10:46 pm
(This post was last modified: September 11, 2016 at 10:58 pm by Huggy Bear.)
(September 11, 2016 at 10:07 pm)bennyboy Wrote:(September 11, 2016 at 8:58 pm)Huggy74 Wrote: You hypocrites really want to go down this road?
Do I seriously need to continue to expose the double standard?
Yes, please.
thought you'd never ask...
The double standard is all the people that came out in defense of a certain gay politician having sex with an underage boy. At first everyone played dumb, then they began making excuses.
The irony is it was considered 'slanderous' when HE was referred to as a pedophile...
(May 31, 2014 at 10:59 am)Esquilax Wrote: 16 is the age of consent where I am. Bit shaky, but I don't find this particularly objectionable on its own, and certainly not enough to label the guy a pedophile. Seems like classic theistic stretching beyond their means to me.
(May 31, 2014 at 11:13 am)Maelstrom Wrote: A statutory rapist under a superfluous law is one thing. Taking the unreasonable theistic leap of referring to him as a pedophile is something else.
Notice how statutory rape is suddenly a SUPERFLUOUS law when it involves a gay man?
Also some victim blaming.
(May 31, 2014 at 11:06 am)Chas Wrote: Note that Milk recorded his age as 18. It is credible that the boy said he was, and if you look at photographs, he looks all of 18.That enough or need I go on?
He didn't look like a child, so the accusation of pedophilia collapses.
(May 31, 2014 at 11:16 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Now you're the one that needs to provide evidence to your assertion that the kid lied about his age, and that Milk had no knowledge he was under age.
(May 31, 2014 at 11:27 am)Chas Wrote: Oh, bullshit. I didn't make an assertion that he lied. I said it is credible that he may have lied as Milk recorded it as 18.
And he looked much older than 16, so that alone defeats the argument for pedophilia.
(May 31, 2014 at 11:34 am)Huggy74 Wrote: Or he recorded his age as 18 because what he was doing was, i don't know..Illegal?
(May 31, 2014 at 11:27 am)Chas Wrote: And he looked much older than 16, so that alone defeats the argument for pedophilia.Perfectly valid legal defense.
(September 11, 2016 at 10:35 pm)KevinM1 Wrote: Incoming whining about Harvey Milk in 3...2...1.....
ofcourse! What other double standard would I be referring to on the subject of adults having sex with underage teens?