9-11, give me a break.

[Thumpalumpacus]

Oh what the hell, I think it was a controlled demo false flag and flight 93 was intended for building 7.

This this will explain the hypothesis: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread840964/pg1

So think about this, we have a timeline where flight 93 is hijacked and then the hijackers wait over 45 minutes to take over the plane, you have an airforce that can respond to a hijacked plane in 7 minutes, yet they waited 45 minutes to hijack flight 93- both towers had already been hit, surely hijackers would have hijacked the plane as early as possible and heading south straight away if they were heading to Washington DC.

We've got a lot of experience with terrorists who delay a second attack until the first responders are already committed. Is it not possible that they had that in mind?

Your point here is built on a large and unsupported assumption.

As the article explains, the theory is that the 'hijacker's' plan was in fact to wait for both towers to have collapsed, thus leaving space to hit WTC7.

Well, Allah must have been with them, for even as Flight 93 fell hundreds of miles short, WTC7 still fell hundreds of feet to the ground.

With the towers standing, a plane could not hit WTC7, but after both had collapsed, if flight 93 was in fact heading for New York, there would have been about twenty minutes after the second tower collapsing and then WTC7 being struck. They would have destroyed all the evidence with WTC7.

Flight 93 wasn't headed for New York. Here's its flight path. The ESE heading before resistance was carrying it at least 200 miles south of NYC.

Flight 93 was speculated to have been heading to Washington DC, but that was the conclusion of the 9/11 comission, the diagram of the flight path shows it heading east, and arguably more in line with heading to New York than Washington DC.

Not so -- look at the above diagram.

As for speculation, it's funny you should bring that up as a criticism, considering the first paragraph of your post here.

Why would they risk all that time in the air, coming back from Ohio? They must have known they would be shot down… if they were terrorists with box cutters that is.

However, if “the terrorists” knew that multiple national security drills would be taking place that day and that NORAD rules had been changed in June of 2001 that kept NORAD commanders from giving the “intercept and engage” order, perhaps they would have known they had more time.

Perhaps, in that case, they would have known they had just enough time to circle around on a long exposed “hijacked” flight just long enough for both towers to “collapse” just as they made it back to downtown Manhattan.

And that is exactly why they waited so long. They were waiting for a clear path to Building 7.

What's this? More speculation? Forgive my chuckling, but you're using the same methodology you're criticizing.

I'm sure you can thumb through the NIST report yourself.  I'm not your google....bud.

I've got better things to do that jump down rabbit-holes.

If you want to change minds, you'll need to present your data, evidence, and support your arguments yourself.

If you don't want to change minds, then why are you posting this crap at all?